All Concepts are NOT created Equal

“Logical errors are, I think, of greater practical importance than many people believe; they enable their perpetrators to hold the comfortable position on every subject in turn. Any logically coherent body of doctrine is sure to be in part painful and contrary to current prejudices.”
___ Bertrand Russell, History of Western Philosophy, 1945

Some debaters like to argue that all opinions have equal value. To put it bluntly, this is utter nonsense because some opinions diverge greatly from truth. I value logic, so I find ridiculous ideas particularly irritating. Similarly, an argument may follow the rules of logic yet be palpably ridiculous because it is based upon unfounded premises. In short, it is pure fantasy. I value truth, as applied to reality, so I find phantasmagorical claptrap irritating unless it admits, as does fantasy or science-fiction writing, to being fantasy.

We are daily exposed to cherished beliefs that are without empirical support or logical validity. Religious dogma aside, we are daily exposed to ideas that are without empirical support or logical validity.

The trick, obviously, is to discern the difference and to eschew conceptual detritus. There are some quite good websites that outline the principles of Critical Thinking.

Creationists seem to think that being critical of thinking equates to critical thinking. Needless to say, as in so much else, they are irritatingly illogical in their insistence that any of the various forms of creationism have explanatory merit concerning the origins of life, in particular human life. I'll have more to say on this topic elsewhere because creationism in all its fanciful incarnations and pseudoscience deceptions is a pet peeve.

Silly Ideas Index:
å Aginner Syndrome
å Agnostic vs Atheist
å Agnosticism is NOT more rational than Atheism
å Anthropic Apologetics
å Anti-IDiocy resources
å Anti-Stupidity Quotes
å Apologists make Apologies for God
å Autivaccinism
å Battle to Regress
å Behe Retreats
å Besottism
å Bible Bumping
å Black Sheep are Sheep Too
å CAD - Dastardly Stubborn Mean IV Revised Revisited
å Canadians Can be Stupid Too
å Creationism only flourishes amidst Ignorance
å Claims that Scientists find Extraterrestrial genes...
å Complexity Reductio
å Conservative Antisocial Disorder (CAD)
å Dawkins refutes Behe
å Debunking IDiocy
å Declaration of Independent Thinking
å Dei Non Existent
å Demands for Proof
å Desperate Measures
å Dastardly Stubborn Mean IV Revised
å Error Filled Belief Systems
å Fistians and Fuzzy Illogic
å FLQ
å Follow(ers) Up
å Free Speech or Propaganda of Hate?
å Furor over Stupidity
å Hate Tanks
å If there were a God
å In God, Distrust
å Inverse Correlations
å Inverse Correlation: IQ vs Religiosity
å Jones' Kitzmiller vs Dover decision
å Junk Tanks
å Ken Miller on Collapse of Intelligent Design
å LAME thinking
å Lending NO authority
å Moral Absolutism
å Mythonuttery
å Not So-Hidden IDiot Agendas
å Numbers Games
å One Evolution, Many Creationisms
å Pet Peeves
å Out, Damned Spam!
å Myths Revered and Myths Exposed
å Panstupidity and Jumbo-Mumbo
å Pivar vs PZ
å Pseudoscience Chicanery
å Reducible Illogic
å Regressive God
å Silly Ideas
å Sitia Non Grata
å Spirituality, Religiosity, and Madness
å Statistics on Ignorance
å Sum, ergo Cogito
å Tick Tock
å Un-designed Intelligences
å Wedge Document
å What's intelligent . . . ?
å What's Wrong with Religious Apologetics?
å YEC yack





No comments: